|
|
|
STRATEGIC OUTCOMES |
|
ACTION |
|
Department: |
|
Safe & Prosperous |
X |
Motion |
|
Finance |
|
Active & Appealing |
|
Resolution |
|
|
X |
Respected & Responsible |
|
Ordinance - Introduction |
|
Division: |
|
Connected & Engaged |
|
Ordinance - Adoption |
|
Procurement |
|
Unique & Creative |
|
Public Hearing |
TITLE:
title
Bid Rejection: East Mesa Community Park Bollards
end
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION:
Summary Recommendation
Pursuant to Yuma City Code §36-36, staff is recommending rejection of all bids received for East Mesa Community Park Bollards due to non-responsive delivery timelines. (Engineering RFB-27-090) (David Wostenberg/Robin R. Wilson)
end
STRATEGIC OUTCOME:
This item supports the City Council’s strategic outcome of Respected and Responsible by rejecting the bids, which are non-responsive to serve the community.
REPORT:
Yuma City Code §36-36 provides that all bids or proposals may be rejected in whole or in part, as specified in the solicitation, only if the City Council determines that the action is taken in the best interests of the City.
The City received three bids in response to RFB-27-090. The solicitation required delivery within 35 days after receipt of order (ARO). The bids and stated delivery times were as follows:
- Phillips Forest Products $80,342.80 120 days ARO
- Southwest Lumber $105,885.88 56 days ARO
- Aluforce $120,754.24 120 days ARO
All three bids exceeded the required 35-day ARO and are therefore non-responsive. The bollards must be installed before the park can open, so this delay would postpone opening day.
Approval of this motion will reject the three bids received. The bollards will be purchased and installed under the City’s existing fencing service contract to meet the park opening schedule.
FISCAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
CITY FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
BUDGETED: |
$ 0.00 |
|
STATE FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
AVAILABLE TO TRANSFER: |
$ 0.00 |
|
FEDERAL FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
IN CONTINGENCY: |
$ 0.00 |
|
OTHER SOURCES: |
$ 0.00 |
FUNDING ACCOUNT/FUND #/CIP: |
|
TOTAL |
$ 0.00 |
N/A |
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NOT ATTACHED TO THE CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM THAT ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK:
NONE
IF CITY COUNCIL ACTION INCLUDES A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT, WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ROUTING THE DOCUMENT FOR SIGNATURE AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL?
|
|
Department |
|
|
City Clerk’s Office |
|
|
Document to be recorded |
|
|
Document to be codified |
|
Acting City Administrator: |
Date: |
|
John D. Simonton |
10/12/2026 |
|
Reviewed by City Attorney: |
Date: |
|
Richard W. Files |
10/08/2026 |