|
|
STRATEGIC OUTCOMES |
ACTION |
|
Department: |
☐ Safe & Prosperous |
☒ Motion |
|
Finance |
☐ Active & Appealing |
☐ Resolution |
|
|
☒ Respected & Responsible |
☐ Ordinance - Introduction |
|
Division: |
☐ Connected & Engaged |
☐ Ordinance - Adoption |
|
Procurement |
☐ Unique & Creative |
☐ Public Hearing |
TITLE: t
Rejection of Request for Qualifications: Job Order Contracting (JOC) for Utility Infrastructure Services
end
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Summary Recommendation
Pursuant to Yuma City Code §36-36, staff recommends rejection of the responses received for the JOC for Utility Infrastructure Services. (Engineering-RFQ-24-291) (David Wostenberg/Jeremy McCall/ Robin R. Wilson)
end
STRATEGIC OUTCOME:
This item supports the City Council’s strategic outcome of Respected and Responsible by rejecting the responses.
REPORT:
Yuma City Code § 36-36 permits the City Council to reject all bids (responses) received in response to a solicitation “if it is determined by the City Council that such action is taken in the best interests of the City.”
The responses received are not advantageous to the City due to information inadvertently not included in the solicitation. The City was to include a project schedule and project final budget for design and construction or life cycle budget for a procurement that includes maintenance services or operations services, per A.R.S. 34-603F. Also, the City will add grant stipulations to the solicitation and contract where permissible.
Approving this motion will reject the responses received. The solicitation will be revised, re-advertised, and resolicited.
FISCAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
CITY FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
BUDGETED: |
$ 0.00 |
|
STATE FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
AVAILABLE TO TRANSFER: |
$ 0.00 |
|
FEDERAL FUNDS: |
$ 0.00 |
IN CONTINGENCY: |
$ 0.00 |
|
OTHER SOURCES: |
$ 0.00 |
FUNDING: ACCOUNT/FUND #/CIP |
TOTAL $ 0.00
|
|
|
|
To total; right click number & choose “Update Field” |
|
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT:
NONE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NOT ATTACHED TO THE CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM THAT ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK:
NONE
IF CITY COUNCIL ACTION INCLUDES A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT, WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ROUTING THE DOCUMENT FOR SIGNATURE AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL?
☐ Department
☐ City Clerk’s Office
☐ Document to be recorded
☐ Document to be codified
|
Acting City Administrator: |
Date: |
|
John D. Simonton |
09/23/2024 |
|
Reviewed by City Attorney: |
Date: |
|
Richard W. Files |
09/20/2024 |